Re: Log class problems

[Alexey Parshin <alexeyp@gmail.com>]

I don't want to discuss that class any longer. If you don't like it - write
your own.
I really like it the way it is now. It is something I wanted to have for a
long time and I finally have it.

2006/2/1, Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh <ilya@total-knowledge.com>:
>
> OK. Here is another example, where clear separation is good.
>
> Let's for a second forget manipulators - i.e. suppose we set priority
> some other way.
>
> Let's say I have special formatting stream (it edits out anything that
> looks
> like password), and I want to use that stream for logging.
>
> With clear separation all I have to do
> CBaseLogBuf* logbuf=<get logger buffer from somewhere>
> iluxa::password_eating_stream log(logbuf);
>
> and then just write to log.
>
> As for priorities - since they are part of logging itself, setting them
> logically belongs to logbuf (and that's where they are implemented)
> so, the manipulators are just a shortcut to make usage easier and
> cleaner - so, strictly speaking are not required.
>
> Alexey Parshin wrote:
>
> >I like the current implementation. So far - I didn't see anything in
> >your arguments that would impress me. If you don't like that idea -
> >fine, don't sponsor it.
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh
> Total Knowledge. CTO
> http://www.total-knowledge.com
>
>


--
Alexey Parshin,
http://www.sptk.net